Canadian organizations with a published AI policy
Every record links to the public source document. Inclusion does not mean a policy is good, and a missing record does not prove an organization lacks governance.
Registry snapshot
- Artifacts
- 387
- Formal policies
- 203
- Operational guidance
- 184
Browse by sector
See what schools, libraries, newsrooms, non-profits and regulators actually publish — each link opens the registry, filtered.
- Education209
- Libraries & culture37
- Media & communications28
- Nonprofits & associations21
- Health & professional regulation21
- Business & professional services16
- Public agencies & research14
- Other13
- Infrastructure, transport & energy11
- Public safety & justice9
- Finance & insurance8
Browse by region
“National” means organizations whose mandate spans the whole country — it is not the sum of the provinces. A province means the organization is based and operating there.
- Ontario127
- National66
- British Columbia61
- Alberta55
- Quebec42
- Nova Scotia11
- Manitoba10
- Saskatchewan7
- New Brunswick3
- Atlantic Canada2
- Northwest Territories1
- Newfoundland and Labrador1
- Prince Edward Island1
See also: provincial and territorial policies · municipal registry · registry overview
Browse the registry
Search covers organization name, sector, region, document title, plain-language summary, described scope, and key controls.
- Try:
15 of 387 organizations
Canadian Journal of Emergency and Response Studies
Open-access emergency-management journal · Ontario
An open-access emergency-management journal supporting publishing, research, or academic information in Ontario.
Description under review — read the source document.
Magnolia Marketing Communications
Marketing and communications agency · British Columbia
A marketing and communications agency providing communications, creative, public-relations, or marketing services in British Columbia.
Magnolia staff must disclose AI assistance, obtain human approval, verify outputs against three sources, keep sensitive and client data out of AI tools, and double-review public content.
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Federal research-funding council · National
A federal research-funding council delivering public administration, oversight, regulation, or public services across Canada.
NSERC makes applicants accountable for AI-assisted grant content, requires disclosure where applicable, and prohibits reviewers from using generative AI with confidential proposal material.
NOSM University
University · Ontario
A post-secondary institution providing education, training, research, and student services in Ontario.
NOSM faculty and learners must disclose AI use, obtain consent before entering protected data, review outputs, preserve human grading and clinical judgment, and remain accountable for results.
Olds College of Agriculture & Technology
College / polytechnic · Alberta
A professional regulatory organization supporting professional regulation, standards, licensing, governance, or member services in Alberta.
Olds College’s administrative-data rules require AI to meet privacy and access law, address bias and human rights, retain oversight, disclose use, verify outputs, and support monitoring.
Ottawa Catholic School Board
School board · Ontario
A school board supporting K–12 schools, students, educators, and district services in Ontario.
Ottawa Catholic staff must use privacy-reviewed AI tools, disclose assistance, critically review outputs, promote equity, and follow administrative oversight for additional tools.
Parkland School Division
School board · Alberta
A school board supporting K–12 schools, students, educators, and district services in Alberta.
Parkland staff and students must disclose AI use, follow teacher permissions, verify accuracy and bias, protect identifying data, respect privacy and copyright, and avoid deceptive media.
Peel Multicultural Council
Settlement and multicultural community-services nonprofit · Ontario
A settlement and multicultural community-services nonprofit providing programs, supports, resources, or community services in Ontario.
Peel Multicultural Council requires authorized AI use, protects client and confidential data, requires human verification and disclosure, assigns user accountability, and applies consequences for misuse.
Royal Roads University
Public university · British Columbia
A post-secondary institution providing education, training, research, and student services in British Columbia.
Royal Roads’ community must protect personal and confidential data in AI, verify and cite outputs, disclose assistance, follow course and workplace expectations, and retain human accountability.
Simon Fraser University
University · British Columbia
A post-secondary institution providing education, training, research, and student services in British Columbia.
SFU faculty and staff in administrative work must check privacy requirements and supervisors before sensitive AI use, verify results, disclose assistance, use approved tools, and remain accountable.
Spritz, social + numérique and POP, culture + numérique
Social, digital, content, and cultural marketing agency · Quebec
A social, digital, content, and cultural marketing agency providing communications, creative, public-relations, or marketing services in Quebec.
Employees and members must protect personal data, preserve human review of AI decisions and content, prevent bias, disclose material AI use, and follow lead oversight, audits, risk and procurement controls.
Swan Valley School Division
School board · Manitoba
A school board supporting K–12 schools, students, educators, and district services in Manitoba.
Staff and students must disclose AI-assisted academic work, verify accuracy and bias, protect personal and confidential data, respect copyright, preserve teacher judgment, avoid unauthorized deepfakes and receive responsible-use training.
Taproot Publishing Inc.
Local journalism and civic information · Alberta
A local journalism and civic information providing news, information, storytelling, or community media in Alberta.
Journalists may use AI for research and production support, but must protect confidential information, verify and human-review all output, disclose significant use, and never replace reporting or create misleading synthetic media.
The United Church of Canada Foundation
National faith-based charitable foundation · National
A national faith-based charitable foundation providing programs, supports, resources, or community services across Canada.
Foundation personnel must keep sensitive and personal information out of public AI, verify and human-review outputs, disclose material use, respect copyright and intellectual property, and seek approval for higher-risk applications.
Université du Québec à Chicoutimi
Public university · Quebec
A post-secondary institution providing education, training, research, and student services in Quebec.
UQAC community members must disclose generative AI use, retain responsibility and critical judgment, adapt use to teaching and research contexts, protect privacy and confidential information, respect intellectual property and review bias.
Frequently asked questions
- What is the organizations registry?
- It is a source-linked list of Canadian organizations — schools, libraries, non-profits, health and professional bodies, media outlets, agencies — that have published an AI policy or operational guidance. Every record links to the public source document, which is always the authority. Municipal records live in the separate registry at /municipalities.
- Where do the descriptions come from?
- Each description is written from the public source document and reviewed by a human before it appears here. Descriptions summarise what a document covers and which controls it names. They are never a score, a grade, or an opinion about whether the policy is good. Our approach is documented on /methodology.
- Why do some organizations have no description?
- A small number of records are still being adjudicated — usually because the source was hard to access, the document is an AI strategy rather than a use policy, or the scope was unclear. The organization stays listed with its source link, and the description appears once review is finished.
- What is the difference between a formal policy and operational guidance?
- A formal policy is an approved governing document. Operational guidance is practical direction staff actually follow — newsroom standards, classroom rules, a staff handbook section. Both count as published governance; neither is automatically stronger than the other.
- My organization is not listed. What should I do?
- Submit your policy through the form below. A missing record does not prove an organization lacks governance — it usually means we have not found a public source document yet.
- We do not have an AI policy yet. Where do we start?
- Read a few comparable records here to see what peers actually committed to, then use the Policy Builder in the Policy Studio at /studio to draft your own, and /policy-review to check an existing draft against the same control library.
How you can help
Submit proof of AI policy
Got a published policy? Send us the link and we'll update the organization.
Submit proofSuggest an organization or feature
Suggest an organization for our agents to scout in the next pass, or suggest a feature you'd like to see.
Share a suggestion