Canadian organizations with a published AI policy
Every record links to the public source document. Inclusion does not mean a policy is good, and a missing record does not prove an organization lacks governance.
Registry snapshot
- Artifacts
- 387
- Formal policies
- 203
- Operational guidance
- 184
Browse by sector
See what schools, libraries, newsrooms, non-profits and regulators actually publish — each link opens the registry, filtered.
- Education209
- Libraries & culture37
- Media & communications28
- Nonprofits & associations21
- Health & professional regulation21
- Business & professional services16
- Public agencies & research14
- Other13
- Infrastructure, transport & energy11
- Public safety & justice9
- Finance & insurance8
Browse by region
“National” means organizations whose mandate spans the whole country — it is not the sum of the provinces. A province means the organization is based and operating there.
- Ontario127
- National66
- British Columbia61
- Alberta55
- Quebec42
- Nova Scotia11
- Manitoba10
- Saskatchewan7
- New Brunswick3
- Atlantic Canada2
- Northwest Territories1
- Newfoundland and Labrador1
- Prince Edward Island1
See also: provincial and territorial policies · municipal registry · registry overview
Browse the registry
Search covers organization name, sector, region, document title, plain-language summary, described scope, and key controls.
- Try:
11 of 387 organizations
CU Inc.
Regulated electricity and natural-gas utility company · Alberta
A regulated electricity and natural-gas utility company providing electricity, natural gas, or utility services in Alberta.
CU Inc.'s official disclosure says its enterprise AI controls require prior approval and testing, restrict use to approved tools, block unapproved and agentic AI, protect data, and retain human oversight.
Enbridge Inc.
Energy infrastructure · Alberta
An energy infrastructure operating in Alberta.
Enbridge's AI policy requires approval and risk review for covered systems, assigns human accountability, protects privacy and security, and calls for transparent, fair and monitored use through the AI lifecycle.
Hydro-Quebec
Provincial electric utility and Crown corporation · Quebec
A provincial electric utility and Crown corporation providing electricity, natural gas, or utility services in Quebec.
Hydro-Québec's official summary says its enterprise AI framework defines roles and an operating model, governs risk and compliance, sets model and tool controls, and monitors performance and incidents.
Lanaudiere International
Regional economic-development and export-support organization · Quebec
A regional economic-development and export-support organization operating in Quebec.
The organization's official AI policy summary requires human validation of deliverables, client disclosure, consent before external processing of sensitive data, staff training, bias and plagiarism audits, and incident reporting.
Left Turn Right Turn
Accessibility, transit, and transportation consulting · Ontario
An accessibility, transit, and transportation consulting providing transportation, mobility, logistics, travel, or related services in Ontario.
LTRT's AI policy limits generative use to an approved enterprise tool, requires internal and client-facing disclosure and validation, imposes security and data-sovereignty rules, and extends controls to vendors.
Number Crunchers
Bookkeeping, accounting support, and business advisory services · British Columbia
A bookkeeping, accounting support, and business advisory services operating in British Columbia.
Number Crunchers defines approved and prohibited AI uses, protects data through access controls, requires human oversight and training, monitors incidents, and reviews the policy annually.
Ontario Lacrosse Association
Provincial amateur sport governing body · Ontario
A provincial amateur sport governing body supporting sport participation, development, competition, and physical activity in Ontario.
Ontario Lacrosse representatives must use approved AI environments and work accounts, keep private data out of tools, disclose assistance, review outputs, and remain accountable under monitoring.
SaskPower
Crown utility · Saskatchewan
A crown utility providing electricity, natural gas, or utility services in Saskatchewan.
SaskPower requires approved AI platforms, protects personal and sensitive data, mandates security review and prior approval, requires human code review, and monitors use and exceptions.
Special Olympics British Columbia
Provincial disability sport organization and charity · British Columbia
A provincial disability sport organization and charity supporting sport participation, development, competition, and physical activity in British Columbia.
Description under review — read the source document.
TC Energy Corporation
Energy infrastructure · Alberta
An energy infrastructure operating in Alberta.
Employees and contractors must use approved AI, protect confidential information, verify outputs, complete lifecycle compliance assessments, follow procurement controls and report concerns.
Transportation Appeal Tribunal of Canada
Independent federal transportation tribunal · National
An independent federal transportation tribunal providing transportation, mobility, logistics, travel, or related services across Canada.
Tribunal members may use AI only for grammar and style support; AI cannot make adjudicative decisions, and members remain solely responsible for their analysis, findings, reasons, evidence and application of law.
Frequently asked questions
- What is the organizations registry?
- It is a source-linked list of Canadian organizations — schools, libraries, non-profits, health and professional bodies, media outlets, agencies — that have published an AI policy or operational guidance. Every record links to the public source document, which is always the authority. Municipal records live in the separate registry at /municipalities.
- Where do the descriptions come from?
- Each description is written from the public source document and reviewed by a human before it appears here. Descriptions summarise what a document covers and which controls it names. They are never a score, a grade, or an opinion about whether the policy is good. Our approach is documented on /methodology.
- Why do some organizations have no description?
- A small number of records are still being adjudicated — usually because the source was hard to access, the document is an AI strategy rather than a use policy, or the scope was unclear. The organization stays listed with its source link, and the description appears once review is finished.
- What is the difference between a formal policy and operational guidance?
- A formal policy is an approved governing document. Operational guidance is practical direction staff actually follow — newsroom standards, classroom rules, a staff handbook section. Both count as published governance; neither is automatically stronger than the other.
- My organization is not listed. What should I do?
- Submit your policy through the form below. A missing record does not prove an organization lacks governance — it usually means we have not found a public source document yet.
- We do not have an AI policy yet. Where do we start?
- Read a few comparable records here to see what peers actually committed to, then use the Policy Builder in the Policy Studio at /studio to draft your own, and /policy-review to check an existing draft against the same control library.
How you can help
Submit proof of AI policy
Got a published policy? Send us the link and we'll update the organization.
Submit proofSuggest an organization or feature
Suggest an organization for our agents to scout in the next pass, or suggest a feature you'd like to see.
Share a suggestion